28 Φεβρουαρίου 2013
θεματικές-άστεγοι-παραπομπές βιβλιογραφία
Η Παναγιώτα Κωνσταντινίδου μου την έστειλε, γράφοντας: Mια συχνή εικόνα από Θεσσαλονίκη. Συμβαίνει πάνω από ένα μήνα, ένας άστεγος έχει μετατρέψει τη Στάση Συντριβάνι σε σπίτι-στέκι του. Στην αρχή σκεφτόμουν ότι ίσως θα επιλυθεί το ζήτημα, αλλα συνεχίζεται. Δεν ενδιαφέρεται κάποιος, ώστε να μεταφερθεί σε κατάλληλο μέρος ο άστεγος -και να βοηθηθεί- αλλα για όλους πια είναι απλώς ένα λυπηρό αλλά συνηθισμένο φαινόμενο; Τελικά έχουμε εθιστεί στο πόνο; Ή ο πόνος του αλλου είναι πιο υποφερτός; Πηγή: www.lifo.gr
Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο θεματικές-άστεγοι-παραπομπές βιβλιογραφία
idiotikos xoros-sigkatoikisi-sinthikes sinevresis-toixos-epikoinonia
Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο idiotikos xoros-sigkatoikisi-sinthikes sinevresis-toixos-epikoinonia
ΑΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΣΤΑΘΗ ΤΣΑΓΚΑΡΟΥΣΙΑΝΟ 16.1.2013 Μη μιλάς, αν δεν έχεις κάτι να πεις Όγκοι φλυαρίας και πράξεις μικρές ΣΧΟΛΙΑ (12) 916 Έργο του Μάριου Περράκη Κάθε Τρίτη πρωί που διασχίζω το Κέντρο με τα πόδια για να πάω δουλειά, σκέφτομαι, μέσα στις σκοτούρες, αν έχω κάτι να γράψω που να μην είναι περιττό. Διότι τα περισσότερα εντιτόριαλ από αυτά που γράφω ή διαβάζω στις εφημερίδες μού φαίνονται λόγια βερεσέ. 1. Λένε τα ίδια και τα ίδια, με όλους τους δυνατούς κάθετους και οριζόντιους συνδυασμούς των «θέσεών» τους. Που είναι σχεδόν πάντα απλοϊκές και λίγο-πολύ δημαγωγικές. 2. Εκφράζουν συναισθήματα και όχι πραγματικές απόψεις – συναισθήματα αχρείαστα τέτοια ώρα: από πανικό μέχρι παπαδιαμάντεια εγκαρτέρηση, από θυμό μέχρι αυτομαστίγωση και τύψεις κ.λπ. Γκώσαμε. 3. Σπανίως διαφωτίζουν και αναλύουν την κατάσταση. Προφανώς, οι γράφοντες δεν έχουν επιστημονική αντίληψη, ούτε ιδιαίτερη πείρα σε ανάλογες καταστάσεις. Είτε απλώς δεν είναι οξυδερκείς. 4. Είναι υποκριτικά (και διδακτικά). Υπάρχει τεράστια απόσταση, συνήθως, ανάμεσα σε αυτά που κάποιος γράφει και αυτά που ζει. Αυτά που θέλει κι αυτά που λέει πως θέλει. Θεωρώ εμετικό να γράφεις για τα βάρη της φτωχολογιάς από την ξαπλώστρα σου στο Μπαλί. Τέτοια σκέφτομαι καθώς προβάλλω τα υποψήφια θέματά μου πάνω στις (σκυθρωπές) εικόνες του δρόμου. Και πάντα αποφασίζω ότι αυτά που πάω να γράψω είναι «πολυτελή» και άχρηστα και βαρετά. Θα ήθελα πραγματικά να ήξερα να γράψω κάτι που να σηκώσει απ’ την καρέκλα τους όσους πίνουν καφέ άεργοι, να βγάλει από τα μαγαζιά τους όσους βαράνε μύγες περίλυποι – κάτι πέρα από μεμψιμοιρίες, κατάρες, πεζοτράγουδα, σπουδαιοφάνειες, κηρύγματα, δημαγωγίες, φληναφήματα, ψευδορκίες, αναμασήματα, στρεψοδικίες, φήμες, συκοφαντίες, απειλές, στομφώδη τίποτα. Να γράψω κάτι που να τους διαφωτίσει και να τους βοηθήσει, να τους εξηγήσει πού πάει το πράγμα και γιατί. Επί της ουσίας. Αλλά δεν έχω. Δεν ξέρω. Οι εποχές της κρίσης, ανέκαθεν, γεννούν όγκους νοσηρότητας. Και πλήθος από κήρυκες. Αγκιτάτορες. Προφήτες. Κομπογιαννίτες. Και λοιπά. Στο ίδιο κλίμα, νόσου, γεννιούνται και οι αποκαλυπτικές φωνές – η μεγάλη ποίηση: ο Σολωμός με τη Γυναίκα της Ζάκυθος, ο Ούγκο Φόσκολο, πρωτύτερα, με την Υπερκάλυψή του. Εδώ, σήμερα, υπάρχουν κυρίως φλύαροι νάνοι, όχι ποιητές. Οπότε; Τι απομένει στους απλούς ανθρώπους; Κάτι καλύτερο από τα λόγια. Οι πράξεις. Η πρακτική βοήθεια προς όσους είναι σε χειρότερη φάση από σένα. Ο εθελοντισμός. Τα έργα. Η προσφορά. Όχι άλλο κάρβουνο. Πηγή: www.lifo.gr
Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο
v
http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/VmNuOBJ5rgE?list=UUdUDXD1mrBB7XxWn0Njlxfw
Alex Ross
http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/VmNuOBJ5rgE?list=UUdUDXD1mrBB7XxWn0Njlxfw
Alex Ross
The greatness of Steve Reich is a given. His reputation as a prime originator in contemporary music is more or less etched in stone. In the 1960s and ’70s, he found a rigorous solution to a pressing challenge: how to restore, after a long period of experimentation, the primal pleasures of stable harmony and a steady pulse. Reich did this in a way that was unblinkingly modern, not at all nostalgic or neo-Romantic. Works such as Drumming, Music for 18 Musicians, New York Counterpoint, and You Are (Variations) resonate cleanly through the caverns of the mind, leaving the listener in a state of wide-awake delight. Reich’s influence is vast, reaching far outside classical composition to encompass jazz, rock, pop, electronic music, and hip-hop. On some days, as familiar shimmering patterns echo on the soundtracks of commercials and from the loudspeakers of dance clubs, it seems as though we are living in a world scored by Reich.
In light of the grandeur of his reputation, it is almost disconcerting that the man himself is still so present, writing at full force as he reaches the age of seventy. You can ride the subway to the lower end of Manhattan, emerge onto a street within sight of the Brooklyn Bridge, walk for a minute or two, press a buzzer marked REICH, and, if you are fortunate, hear a crisp voice say “Come on up.” He does not look the part of the musical revolutionist, whatever that might be. With his black button-down shirts and signature baseball cap, he fits the image of an independent film director, a cultural-studies professor, or some other out-in-the-world intellectual. Once he starts speaking, you feel the peculiar velocity of his mind. He is, notably, as much a listener as a talker, although he talks at blistering speed. He reacts swiftly to slight sounds in his midst—the soft buzz of a cell phone, a siren on the street outside, the whistle of a teakettle. Each sound has some information to give him. The windows have thick double panes; even for a listener as omnivorous as Reich, the city gives out too much information.
Steve Reich was born in New York, on October 3, 1936. His parents separated when he was still a baby, and he spent much of his childhood riding trains back and forth to Los Angeles, where his mother, a successful singer and lyricist, had moved. He later said that the clickety-clack of wheels on tracks helped to shape his rhythmic sense. Otherwise, he had a fairly ordinary middle-class upbringing; he absorbed all the humming waves of information that were being given out by America’s culture of postwar prosperity. His formative musical experiences were with recordings, rather than with live performances. In particular, he found himself listening nonstop to Bach’s Brandenburg Concerto No. 5, Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring, and various bebop records featuring the likes of Charlie Parker, Miles Davis, and Kenny Clarke.
Inclined at first toward philosophy, he studied the thought of Ludwig Wittgenstein at Cornell. Then he went to Juilliard for music. Seeking an escape from the East Coast establishment, he moved to San Francisco and enrolled in the music school at Mills College, where the Italian avant-gardist Luciano Berio was a visiting professor in 1961 and 1962. Most of Reich’s early works employed Schoenberg’s twelve-tone method, but there was something grudging about his use of the then-canonical compositional system. He began to hear alternatives in the modal improvisations of John Coltrane, whom he went to hear some fifty times, and also in archival recordings of polyrhythmic African drumming. He also dabbled in San Francisco’s nascent psychedelic culture; he collaborated with one of his fellow students, Phil Lesh, later the bass player of The Grateful Dead, on far-out happenings and prankster spectacles.
In the fall of 1964, Reich participated in the first performance of Terry Riley’s In C, a hypnotic haze of multiple, looping patterns derived from the C-major scale. Phenomena of repetition intrigued him to no end. One day in January, 1965, he was fooling around with tapes of a Pentecostal preacher shouting “It ain’t gonna rain!” when he noticed an interesting effect. Two identical tapes of the preacher’s voice were running in unison, but one machine was playing slightly faster than the other, so that the tapes began to go out of phase: “It’s-s gonna-a rain-n! It’s-‘s gonn-nna rai-in! It’s-t’s gonna-onna rai-ain! It’s-it’s gonna-gonna rain-rain!” Listening on stereo headphones, with one ear tuned to the left machine and the other to the right, Reich had a physical reaction; the sound went down one side of his body and up the other. He generated an electronic composition from this happy accident, entitled It’s Gonna Rain. He then made another, Come Out, based on the voice of Daniel Hamm, one of six African-American boys who were beaten up in a Harlem police precinct house in 1964.
Reich now had a stroke of genius: he translated the going-out-of-phase effect into instrumental music. Piano Phase,for two pianos, uses a repeating pattern made up of the first six notes of the major scale. As the pianists move in and out of sync, a surprisingly eventful and colorful narrative unfolds, replete with modulations, transitions, and climaxes. In this and other pioneering process-driven works, a distinctive personality emerges — lean in form, detached in mood, logical in movement, yet marked by some indefinable mixture of beauty and sadness. The music has a soul of its own, which may fascinate and mystify the composer as much as it does the rest of us.
What came to be called minimalism was unleashed full force in Four Organs, first conceived in August 1969, the month of the Manson murders and the killing of a spectator at a Rolling Stones show in Altamont, California. Explosions of violence had been filling the news: the assassinations of Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr., the massacre at My Lai in Vietnam, riots on university campuses and in inner cities. Four Organs is, in its own way, an apocalyptic, end-of-the-world piece: heard at full volume, its electric-organ sound becomes an all-out assault. The entire piece is based on a six-note chord that consists of a D-major triad superimposed on top of an E-major one. As maracas provide a steady pulse, the notes of the chord are prolonged by degrees, so that the harmony rotates this way and that. After many permutations, it finally resolves on a simple open fifth. In a dark time, Reich was finding his way back to a solid center.
In the 1976 masterwork Music for 18 Musicians, pulsating rhythm is balanced by a comparably sophisticated drama of harmony. The piece is almost symphonic in its narrative arc, proceeding from light to dark and back to light again.It is built on a cycle of eleven chords, each of which governs a section from two or seven minutes in length. Early on, bass instruments emphasize a low D, giving the feeling that this is the work’s tonal center and basement level. But in Section V, bass clarinets and clarinets lower the floor from D to C sharp — a crucial alteration in the physical space of the music. The harmony plunges toward C-sharp minor, and rugged six-note figures come burrowing in. A similar change in the weather darkens Section IX, which is almost expressionistic in its stabbing intensity. Only at the end do D- and A-major-ish chords brighten the air.
Reich wrote several more examples of what might be called “grand minimalism,” letting his discoveries resonate within a large frame. In Drumming, he applied lessons that he had learned from studying West African drumming at the University of Ghana. The Desert Music and Tehillim are spacious, dramatic settings of William Carlos Williams and the Hebrew Psalms, respectively. Then, a new project seized Reich’s attention: he worked to erase the boundary between speech and music, by teasing melodies out of the rise and fall of recorded voices. In the 1990s, he produced a pair of video operas with live accompaniment. First came The Cave, which explored the history of the Cave at Hebron and the Biblical stories related to it. Then came Three Tales, which tells three parables of technology run amok: the crash of the German airship Hindenburg, the testing of atomic bombs on Bikini Atoll, and, in a preview of a catastrophe to come, the birth of artificial intelligence and cloning. In recent years, Reich has once again emphasized instrumental writing; in the Triple Quartet and You Are (Variations), classic minimalism is enriched with new harmonic adventures and diversions.
Perhaps the most haunting Reich work to date is Different Trains, which was given its premiere in 1988, by the Kronos Quartet. This was the first piece in which the composer used recorded speech to create melodic lines. It stemmed from the memory of those long railroad journeys of childhood, and also from the adult reflection that if Reich had been a child in Europe in the 1940s his fate might have been different: “As a Jew, I would have had to ride on very different trains.” The electronic component mingles voices of African-American Pullman porters with those of Holocaust survivors and the neutral noise of train whistles. As the string instruments sing along to these memory-shrouded sounds, they don’t tell us what to feel; they set forth a glistening grid, on which we can plot our own emotions. The result is a music of precision and tears.
–Alex Ross, 2006
Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο
27 Φεβρουαρίου 2013
26 Φεβρουαρίου 2013
Parallel projection
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2009) |
Part of a series on |
Graphical projection |
---|
Parallel projections have lines of projection that are parallel both in reality and in the projection plane.[clarification needed]
Parallel projection corresponds to a perspective projection with an infinite focal length (the distance from the image plane to the projection point), or “zoom“.
Within parallel projection there is an ancillary category known as “pictorials”. Pictorials show an image of an object as viewed from a skew direction in order to reveal all three directions (axes) of space in one picture. Because pictorial projections innately contain this distortion, in the rote, drawing instrument for pictorials, some liberties may be taken for economy of effort and best effect.
Contents[hide] |
[edit]Orthographic projection
The orthographic projection is derived from the principles of descriptive geometry, and is a type of parallel projection where the projection rays are perpendicular to the projection plane.[1] It is the projection type of choice for working drawings.
The term orthographic is also sometimes reserved specifically for depictions of objects where the axis or plane of the object is also parallel with the projection plane (paper on which the Orthographic or parallel projection is drawn.[1]
[edit]Pictorials
[edit]Axonometric projection
Axonometric projection is a type of orthographic projection where the plane or axis of the object depicted is not parallel to the projection plane,[2][3][4] such that multiple sides of an object are visible in the same image.[5] It is further subdivided into three groups: isometric, dimetric and trimetric projection, depending on the exact angle at which the view deviates from the orthogonal.[1][4] A typical characteristic of axonometric pictorials is that one axis of space is usually displayed as vertical.
[edit]Isometric projection
In isometric pictorials (for protocols see isometric projection), the most common form of axonometric projection,[3] the direction of viewing is such that the three axes of space appear equally foreshortened, of which the displayed angles among them and also the scale of foreshortening are universally known. However in creating a final, isometric instrument drawing, in most cases a full-size scale, i.e., without using a foreshortening factor, is employed to good effect because the resultant distortion is difficult to perceive.[citation needed]
[edit]Dimetric projection
In dimetric pictorials (for protocols see dimetric projection), the direction of viewing is such that two of the three axes of space appear equally foreshortened, of which the attendant scale and angles of presentation are determined according to the angle of viewing; the scale of the third direction (vertical) is determined separately. Approximations are common in dimetric drawings.
[edit]Trimetric projection
In trimetric pictorials (for protocols see trimetric projection), the direction of viewing is such that all of the three axes of space appear unequally foreshortened. The scale along each of the three axes and the angles among them are determined separately as dictated by the angle of viewing. Approximations in trimetric drawings are common,[clarification needed] and trimetric perspective is seldom used.[4]
[edit]Oblique projection
In oblique projections the parallel projection rays are not perpendicular to the viewing plane as with orthographic projection, but strike the projection plane at an angle other than ninety degrees.[1] In both orthographic and oblique projection, parallel lines in space appear parallel on the projected image. Because of its simplicity, oblique projection is used exclusively for pictorial purposes rather than for formal, working drawings. In an oblique pictorial drawing, the displayed angles among the axes as well as the foreshortening factors (scale) are arbitrary. The distortion created thereby is usually attenuated by aligning one plane of the imaged object to be parallel with the plane of projection thereby creating a true shape, full-size image of the chosen plane. Special types of oblique projections are cavalier projection and cabinet projection.[2]
[edit]Limitations
See also: Impossible object
Objects drawn with parallel projection do not appear larger or smaller as they extend closer to or away from the viewer. While advantageous forarchitectural drawings, where measurements must be taken directly from the image, the result is a perceived distortion, since unlike perspective projection, this is not how our eyes or photography normally work. It also can easily result in situations where depth and altitude are difficult to gauge, as is shown in the illustration to the right.
In this isometric drawing, the blue sphere is two units higher than the red one. However, this difference in elevation is not apparent if one covers the right half of the picture, as the boxes (which serve as clues suggesting height) are then obscured.
This visual ambiguity has been exploited in op art, including “impossible object” drawings. M. C. Escher‘s Waterfall (1961) is a well-known example, in which a channel of water seems to travel unaided along a downward path, only to then paradoxically fall once again as it returns to its source. The water thus appears to disobey the law of conservation of energy.
[edit]See also
Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο
gia katerina gian
Penrose stairs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Penrose stairs or Penrose steps, also dubbed the impossible staircase, is an impossible object created by Lionel Penrose and his son Roger Penrose.[1] A variation on the Penrose triangle, it is a two-dimensional depiction of a staircase in which the stairs make four 90-degree turns as they ascend or descend yet form a continuous loop, so that a person could climb them forever and never get any higher. This is clearly impossible in three dimensions.
The “continuous staircase” was first presented in an article that the Penroses wrote in 1959, based on the so-called “triangle of Penrose” published by Roger Penrose in the British Journal of Psychology in 1958.[1] M.C. Escher then discovered the Penrose stairs in the following year and made his now famous lithography Klimmen en dalen (Ascending and Descending) in March 1960. Penrose and Escher were informed of each other’s work that same year.[2] Escher developed the theme further in his print Waterval (Waterfall), which appeared in 1961.
In their original article the Penroses noted that “each part of the structure is acceptable as representing a flight of steps but the connexions are such that the picture, as a whole, is inconsistent: the steps continually descend in a clockwise direction.”[3]
Δεν επιτρέπεται σχολιασμός στο gia katerina gian