28 Ιανουαρίου 2021
23 Ιουνίου 2020
coding-
List of programming languages
Programming language lists |
---|
|
- Note: Dialects of BASIC have been moved to the separate List of BASIC dialects.
- Note: This page does not list esoteric programming languages.
Contents: [hide]
|
[edit]A
[edit]B
|
[edit]C
|
[edit]D
[edit]E
[edit]F
[edit]G
[edit]H
[edit]I
[edit]J
[edit]K
[edit]L
[edit]M
|
[edit]N
|
[edit]O
[edit]P
|
[edit]Q
[edit]R
[edit]S
[edit]T
[edit]U
[edit]V
[edit]W
[edit]X
[edit]Y
[edit]Z
- Coding
- Compilation
- Debugging
- Documentation
- Integration
- Maintenance
- Requirements analysis
- Software architecture
- Software testing
- Specification
[edit]
Digital Aesthetics: Introduction
GLOSSERY OF TERMS
Computational Intelligence
Michael I. Jordan and Stuart Russell
There are two complementary views of artificial intelligence (AI): one as an engineer- ing discipline concerned with the creation of intelligent machines, the other as an empirical science concerned with the computational modeling of human intelligence. When the field was young, these two views were seldom distinguished. Since then, a substantial divide has opened up, with the former view dominating modern AI and the latter view characterizing much of modern cognitive science. For this reason, we have adopted the more neutral term “computational intelligence” as the title of this arti- cle—both communities are attacking the problem of understanding intelligence in computational terms.
It is our belief that the differences between the engineering models and the cogni- tively inspired models are small compared to the vast gulf in competence between these models and human levels of intelligence. For humans are, to a first approxima- tion, intelligent; they can perceive, act, learn, reason, and communicate successfully despite the enormous difficulty of these tasks. Indeed, we expect that as further progress is made in trying to emulate this success, the engineering and cognitive mod- els will become more similar. Already, the traditionally antagonistic “connectionist” and “symbolic” camps are finding common ground, particularly in their understand- ing of reasoning under uncertainty and learning. This sort of cross-fertilization was a central aspect of the early vision of cognitive science as an interdisciplinary enter- prise.
1 Machines and Cognition
The conceptual precursors of AI can be traced back many centuries. LOGIC, the formal theory of deductive reasoning, was studied in ancient Greece, as were ALGORITHMS for mathematical computations. In the late seventeenth century, Wilhelm Leibniz actually constructed simple “conceptual calculators,” but their representational and combinatorial powers were far too limited. In the nineteenth century, Charles Babbage designed (but did not build) a device capable of universal computation, and his collab- orator Ada Lovelace speculated that the machine might one day be programmed to play chess or compose music. Fundamental work by ALAN TURING in the 1930s for- malized the notion of universal computation; the famous CHURCH–TURING THESIS pro- posed that all sufficiently powerful computing devices were essentially identical in the sense that any one device could emulate the operations of any other. From here it was a small step to the bold hypothesis that human cognition was a form of COMPUTATION in exactly this sense, and could therefore be emulated by computers.
By this time, neurophysiology had already established that the brain consisted largely of a vast interconnected network of NEURONS that used some form of electrical signalling mechanism. The first mathematical model relating computation and the brain appeared in a seminal paper entitled “A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity,” by WARREN MCCULLOCH and WALTER PITTS (1943). The paper proposed an abstract model of neurons as linear threshold units—logical “gates” that output a signal if the weighted sum of their inputs exceeds a threshold value (see COM– PUTING IN SINGLE NEURONS). It was shown that a network of such gates could repre- sent any logical function, and, with suitable delay components to implement memory, would be capable of universal computation. Together with HEBB’s model of learning in networks of neurons, this work can be seen as a precursor of modern NEURAL NET– WORKS and connectionist cognitive modeling. Its stress on the representation of logi- cal concepts by neurons also provided impetus to the “logicist” view of AI.
The emergence of AI proper as a recognizable field required the availability of usable computers; this resulted from the wartime efforts led by Turing in Britain and by JOHN VON NEUMANN in the United States. It also required a banner to be raised;
One should not underestimate the level of controversy surrounding AI’s initial phase. The popular press was only too ready to ascribe intelligence to the new “elec- tronic super-brains,” but many academics refused to contemplate the idea of intelli- gent computers. In his 1950 paper, Turing went to great lengths to catalogue and refute many of their objections. Ironically, one objection already voiced by Kurt Gödel, and repeated up to the present day in various forms, rested on the ideas of incompleteness and undecidability in formal systems to which Turing himself had contributed (see GÖDEL’S THEOREMS and FORMAL SYSTEMS, PROPERTIES OF). Other objectors denied the possibility of CONSCIOUSNESS in computers, and with it the pos- sibility of intelligence. Turing explicitly sought to separate the two, focusing on the objective question of intelligent behavior while admitting that consciousness might remain a mystery—as indeed it has.
The next step in the emergence of AI was the formation of a research community; this was achieved at the 1956 Dartmouth meeting convened by John McCarthy. Per- haps the most advanced work presented at this meeting was that of ALLEN NEWELL and Herb Simon, whose program of research in symbolic cognitive modeling was one of the principal influences on cognitive psychology and information-processing psy- chology. Newell and Simon’s IPL languages were the first symbolic programming languages and among the first high-level languages of any kind. McCarthy’s LISP language, developed slightly later, soon became the standard programming language of the AI community and in many ways remains unsurpassed even today.
Contemporaneous developments in other fields also led to a dramatic increase in the precision and complexity of the models that could be proposed and analyzed. In linguistics, for example, work by Chomsky (1957) on formal grammars opened up new avenues for the mathematical modeling of mental structures. NORBERT WIENER developed the field of cybernetics (see CONTROL THEORY and MOTOR CONTROL) to provide mathematical tools for the analysis and synthesis of physical control systems. The theory of optimal control in particular has many parallels with the theory of ratio- nal agents (see below), but within this tradition no model of internal representation was ever developed.
As might be expected from so young a field with so broad a mandate that draws on so many traditions, the history of AI has been marked by substantial changes in fash- ion and opinion. Its early days might be described as the “Look, Ma, no hands!” era, when the emphasis was on showing a doubting world that computers could play chess, learn, see, and do all the other things thought to be impossible. A wide variety of methods was tried, ranging from general-purpose symbolic problem solvers to simple neural networks. By the late 1960s, a number of practical and theoretical setbacks had convinced most AI researchers that there would be no simple “magic bullet.” The gen- eral-purpose methods that had initially seemed so promising came to be called weak methods because their reliance on extensive combinatorial search and first-principles knowledge could not overcome the complexity barriers that were, by that time, seen as unavoidable. The 1970s saw the rise of an alternative approach based on the applica- tion of large amounts of domain-specific knowledge, expressed in forms that were close enough to the explicit solution as to require little additional computation. Ed Feigenbaum’s gnomic dictum, “Knowledge is power,” was the watchword of the boom in industrial and commercial application of expert systems in the early 1980s.
When the first generation of expert system technology turned out to be too fragile for widespread use, a so-called AI Winter set in—government funding of AI and pub- lic perception of its promise both withered in the late 1980s. At the same time, a revival of interest in neural network approaches led to the same kind of optimism as had characterized “traditional” AI in the early 1980s. Since that time, substantial progress has been made in a number of areas within AI, leading to renewed commer- cial interest in fields such as data mining (applied machine learning) and a new wave of expert system technology based on probabilistic inference. The 1990s may in fact come to be seen as the decade of probability. Besides expert systems, the so-called
1) Video lectures – 15 hours of video in c. 10 minute blocks on:
flat part recognition, deformable part recognition, range data
and stereo data 3D part recognition, detecting & tracking
objects in video,
and behaviour recognition. There are also about 8 hours of introductory
image processing videos.
2) CVonline – organising about 2000 related topics in imaging & vision,
including some elementary neurophysiology and psychophysics.
Most content is in wikipedia now, but the index is independent.
3) CVonline supplements:
list of online and hardcopy books
list of datasets for research and student projects
list of useful software packages
list of over 300 different image analysis application areas
4) Online education resources of the Int. Assoc. for Pattern Recognition
5) HIPR2 – Image Processing Teaching Materials with JAVA
6) CVDICT: Dictionary of Computer Vision and Image Processing
See more details of these below .
Best wishes, Bob Fisher
================================================================
1) video lectures – 15 hours of video in c. 10 minute blocks.
See: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/AVINVERTED/main_av.htm
Including PDF slides, links to supplementary reading, a drill
question for each video
The site contains a set of video lectures on a subset of computer
vision. It is
intended for viewers who have an understanding of the nature of
images and some
understanding of how they can be processed. The course is more like
Computer Vision 102, introducing a range of standard and acccepted
methods, rather than the latest research advances.
Similarly, there are are about 8 hours of introductory image
processing lectures at:
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/IVRINVERTED/main_ivr.html
with similar resources
================================================================
2) CVonline is a free WWW-based set of introductions to topics in
computer vision.
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/CVonline/
Because of the improvements in the content available in Wikipedia,
it is now possible to find content for more than 50% of CVonline’s
2000 topics.
CVonline groups together the topics into a sensible topic
hierarchy, but tries
to exploit the advancing quality and breadth of wikipedia’s content.
================================================================
3) CVonline has a variety of supplemental information useful to
students and researchers,
namely lists of:
online and hardcopy books:
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/CVonline/books.htm
datasets for research and student projects:
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/CVonline/Imagedbase.htm
useful software packages:
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/CVonline/SWEnvironments.htm
list of over 300 different image analysis application areas:
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/CVonline/applic.htm
================================================================
4) The education resources of the Int. Assoc. for Pattern Recognition
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/IAPR/
contain many links to Tutorials and Surveys, Explanations, Online Demos,
Datasets, Books, Code for:
Symbolic pattern recognition, Statistical pattern recognition,
Machine learning,
1D Signal pattern recognition and 2D Image analysis and computer vision.
================================================================
5) HIPR2: free WWW-based Image Processing Teaching Materials with JAVA
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/HIPR2/
HIPR2 is a free www-based set of tutorial materials for the 50 most commonly
used image processing operators. It contains tutorial text, sample results
and JAVA demonstrations of individual operators and collections.
================================================================
6) CVDICT: Dictionary of Computer Vision and Image Processing
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/CVDICT/
This are the free view terms A..G from the the first version of the
Dictionary, published by John Wiley and Sons. (Note there there a second
edition currently on sale).
Introduction to Computation and Programming Using Python, revised and expanded edition
Overview
About the Author
Endorsements
—Anne Friedberg, Professor and Chair of Critical Studies, School of Cinematic Arts, USC, and author of The Virtual Window: From Alberti to Microsoft
—Stephen Partridge, Dean of Research, Duncan of Jordanstone College of Art & Design, University of Dundee
Awards
22 Ιουνίου 2020
SEARCH ARTISTS
1. David Rokeby, N’Cha(n)t, 2001
2. Grahame Weinbren, Frames, 1999
3. Char Davies, Ephomere, 1998
4. Bill Viola. Going Forth By Day, 2002
5. Ben Rubin and Mark Hansen, Listening Post, 2003
6. Jenny Holzer. ARNO, 1996
7. Irit Batsry, These Are Not My Images, Neither There Nor Here, 2000
8. Anwar Kanwar, A Season Outside, 1997
9. Lyn Hershman, Conceiving Ada, 1996
10. Laurie Anderson performing Stories from the Nerve Bible. 1995
11. Victoria Vesna with Jim Gimzewski, Zeroawavefunction, Nano Dreams and nightinares, 2002
12. Luc Courchesne. Landscape One. 1997
Figures
Mark Kostabi, Electric Family. 1998, Frontispiece
I.1. Georges Melies. Le Voyage dans Lune
I.2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Astronaut David Scott Plants American Flag on the Moon, July 26, 1971
I.3. Fritz Lang, Metropolis, 1926
I.4. Andy Warhol. Thirty Are Better than One, 1963
I.5. Paul Hosefros, Gauguin and His Flatterers, June 25. 1988
1
1.1. Abraham Bosse (1602-76), Perspective Drawing
1.3. Early camera obscure. from A. Kircher, Ars Magna Lucis et Umbrae. 1645
1.4. Camera obscure, circa seventeenth century
1.5. Camera lucida, circa eighteenth century
1.6. Jan Vermeer. Young Girl With A Flute, 1665
1.7. Theodore Maurisset, La Daguerreotypomanie, 1839
1.8. Eadweard Muybridge, Woman Kicking, 1887
1.9. Raoul Hausmann, Tatlin at Home. 1920
1.10. John Heartfield, Hurrah, die Butter ist All, (Hurrah, the Butter Is Gone!), 1935
1.11. Lumiere Brothers, frames from Un Train Arrive en Gare. 1896
2
2.1. Etienne-Jules Marey. Chronophotographe Geometrique, 1884
2.2. Giacomo Balla, Swifts: Paths of Movement + Dynamic Sequences, 1913
2.3. Marcel Ducharnp, Nude Descending a S.ircase, No. 21912
2.4. Vladimir Tatfin, Monument for the Third International. 1920
2.5. 211810 Moholy-Nagy, Light Space Modulator. 1923-30
2.6. Dziga Vertov, Man with a Movie Camera, 1929
2.7. Marcel Duchamp, The Large Glass or The Bride Stripp. Bare by Her Bachelors, Even, 1915-23 (replica: 1961)
2.8. Charlie Chaplin, Modern Times, 1936
2.9. James Rosenquist Working in Times Square, 1958
2.10. James Rosenquist. Love You with My Ford, 1961
2.11. Andy Warhol, Green Coca-Cola Bottles. 1962
2.12. Andy Warhol, Electric Chair, 1965
2.13. Roy Lichtenstein, Hopeless, 1963
2.14. Eduardo Paolozzi, Artificial Sun. 1965
2.15. Richard Hamilton, Kent State, 1970
3
3.1. Robert Rauschenberg, Signs, 1970
3.2. Keith Haring, Untitled, 1983
3.3. John Baldessari, I Will Not Make Any More Boring Art, 1971
3.4. Mark Tansey, Secret of the Sphinx, 1984
3.5. Jean Dupuy. Jean Tinguely, and Alexander Calder with Heart Bea. Dust, .69
3.6. Jean Dupuy. artist, and Ralph Martel, engineer, Heart Beats Dust 1968
3.7. Pepsi-Cola Pavilion. Osaka, 1970
3.8. Remy Charlip, Homage to Loie Fuller, March 8, 1970
3.9. Merce Cunningham, John Cage and Stan Van 081 8880. Variations V, 1965
3.10. Barbara Kruger, Untit/ed, 1982
3.11. Carolee Schneemann, Cycladic imprints, 1993
3.12. Adrian Piper, What it’s Like, What lt Is, #3, 1.4
3.13. Damien Hirst, Hymn, 2001
3.14. Stelarc, Amplifi. Body, Automat. Arm and Third Hand, 1992
3.15. Larry List, An Excerpt from the History of the World, 1990
3.16. John Craig Freeman, Rocky Fla. Billboards, 1994
3.17. Mierle Laderman Ukeles, Touch Sanitation Show, 1.4
3.18. Krzysztof Wodiczko. Projection on the Hirshhorn Museum. 1988
3.19. Christo and Jeanne Claude, Wrapped Reichstag. Berlin, 1995
3.20. Robert Wilson, Einstein on the Beach (final scene by the lightboard), 1986
4
4.1. Nam June Paik, Magnet TV, 1965
4.2. Nam June Paik, TV Buddha, 1974
4.3. Ulrike Rosenbach, Meine Macht Ist meine Ohnmacht (To Have No Power Is to Have Power),
1978
4.4. Bruce Nauman, Live Tap. Video Corridor, 1969-70
4.5. Dan Graham, Opposing Mirrors and Video Monitors on Time Delay, 1974
4.6. Beryl Korot, Dachau, four-channel video installation, 1974
4.7. Vito Acconci, performance at Reese Paley Gallery. 1971
4.8. Vito Acconci. Dennis Oppenheim, and Terry Fox, performance, 1971
4.9. Frank Gillette and Ira Schneider, Wipe Cycle, 1969
4.10. Juan Downey, Information Withheld, 1983
4.11. Doug Hall, The Terrible Uncertainty of the Thing Described, 1987
4.12. Martha Rosler. Vital Statistics of a Citizen, Simply Obtained, 1977
4.13. Dara Birnbaum, Technology/Transformation: Wonder Woman, 1978/9
4.14. Joan Jonas. Double Lunar Dogs, 1984
4.15. Chris Burden, L.nardo, Michelangelo, F?embrandt, Chris Burden, 1976
4.16. Daniel Reeves, Smothering Dreams. 1981
4.17. Ant Farm, Media Burn, 1974/5
4.18. Paper Tiger TV, Herb Schiller Smashes the Myths of the Information Industry, 1985
4.19. Paper Tiger TV, Taping the People With AIDS Coalition Talk Back Show, 1988
4.20. The Wooster Group, To You The Birdie. 2002
4.21. Judith Barry. Maelstrom (Part One), 1988
4.22. Jean-Luc Godard, and Anne,Marie Motility, Six Fois Deux (Sur et Sous la Communication), 1976
4.23. Frame from Six Fois Deux, 1976
4.24. Frame from Godard, France/tour/detour/deux/enfants, 1978
4.25. Laurie Anderson, 0 Superman, 1981
4.26. Robert Ashley, Cami//a, 1970
4.27. Miroslaw Rogala. Nature Leaving Us. 1989
4.28. Dara Birnbaum, Damnation of Faust: Evocation, 1984
4.29. Nam June Paik, TV Garden, 1974-78
4.30. Bill Viola, Room for St John of the Cross, 1983
4.31. Stein, Borealis. 1993
4.32. Dieter Froese, Not a Model for Big Brother. Spy Cycle (Unprazise Angaben), 1984
4.33. Julia Scher, detail frorn /’// Be Gentle, 1991
4.34. Mary Lucier, Oblique House, 1993
4.35. Tony Oursler, Horror (from Judy), 1994
4.36. Bill Viola, Slowly Turning Narrative, 1992
4.37. Joan Jonas, Lines in the Sand, 2002
4.38. Eija Liisa Ahtila, The House, 2002
4.39. Doug Aitken, New Skin, 2002
4.40. Gary Hill. Still Life, 1999
4.41. Shirin Neshat. Untitled (Rapture series – Women Scatter.), 1999
4.42. Chantal Akerman, Froth the Other Side, 2002
5
6
Digital Currents: Art in the Electronic Age
Περί αλλοτινών χώρων (Des espaces autres) (1967), Ετεροτοπίες Μισέλ Φουκώ